Extending cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk (D+/R-) lung transplant recipients from 6 to 9 months reduces cytomegalovirus disease: A retrospective study

Transpl Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;22(4):e13277. doi: 10.1111/tid.13277. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

Abstract

Rationale: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients receiving a seropositive allograft (D+/R-) are at a high risk of developing CMV disease. Our program increased the duration of CMV prophylaxis from 6 to 9 months in May 2013. Here, we present the impact on the incidence of CMV infection, disease, side effects, rejection, and other factors.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of 241 CMV (D+/R-) patients transplanted between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. Blood CMV testing was done according to protocol. All patients received ganciclovir/valganciclovir as prophylaxis. We compared the incidence and timing of CMV infection and disease up to 6 months after cessation of prophylaxis between patients who received 9 months (May 2013 onwards) and a historical control group who received 6 months of prophylaxis (prior to May 2013). CMV infection was defined as detectable CMV viremia in the absence of symptoms. CMV disease was defined as CMV syndrome or tissue-invasive disease. Side effects of prophylaxis and CMV resistance were recorded.

Results: A total of 116 patients were included in the 6-month group and 125 in the 9-month group. The extended 9-month CMV prophylaxis delayed the onset of CMV infection (median time to CMV infection after lung transplantation 295 vs 353 days, P < .01) but did not significantly reduce the incidence of CMV infection (65% vs 64%, P = .06, log-rank). The 9-month prophylaxis delayed the onset and decreased the incidence of CMV disease from 50% in the 6-month group to 42% (P = .02 log-rank). There was no difference in the rate of adverse effects (leukopenia in 32% in both groups, P = .53) or development of CMV resistance between the two groups (4 cases in both groups, P = .92). There were no significant differences in overall survival or the rate of chronic lung allograft dysfunction between the groups.

Conclusions: Extending duration of CMV prophylaxis from 6 to 9 months resulted in a delayed and decreased incidence of CMV disease in our lung transplant population. The absolute risk reduction achieved by extended CMV prophylaxis was 8%. The incidence of CMV infection, and ganciclovir resistance and side effects were similar between the two groups. Our results suggest that extending CMV prophylaxis in the highest risk CMV D+/R- group is effective in reducing CMV disease.

Keywords: CMV; CMV mismatch; lung transplant; prophylaxis; valganciclovir.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antiviral Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Antiviral Agents / therapeutic use
  • Cytomegalovirus Infections / prevention & control*
  • Drug Administration Schedule*
  • Female
  • Ganciclovir / administration & dosage
  • Ganciclovir / therapeutic use
  • Graft Rejection / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Lung Transplantation / adverse effects*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Transplant Recipients*
  • Transplantation, Homologous
  • Valganciclovir / administration & dosage
  • Valganciclovir / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Valganciclovir
  • Ganciclovir