Background: We compared the Emergency General Surgery Specific Frailty Index (EGSFI), Risk Analysis Index (RAI-C) and the Katz Index (KI) at assessing frailty in acute care surgery (ACS).
Methods: A prospective cohort of ACS patients was stratified into frail or non-frail by the EGSFI, RAI-C and KI. The agreement between scales were compared.
Results: Of 272 eligible patients, 72, 75, and 56 were categorized as frail by the EGSFI, RAI-C, and KI respectively. There was weak to no agreement between instruments and consensus among all three scales was 59.4%.
Conclusion: Between 21 and 28% of patients seen in this ACS cohort were categorized as frail using the EGSFI, RAI-C and KI. These frailty tools have different measures of what constitutes frailty and there was poor agreement between them. Only the KI definition of frailty was associated with a longer LOS. The KI may be more useful for assessing ACS patients in a tertiary care facility.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.