Abstract
There is growing interest in leveraging real-world data to complement knowledge gained from randomized clinical trials and inform the design of prospective randomized studies in oncology. The present study compared clinical outcomes in women with metastatic breast cancer who received letrozole as first-line monotherapy in oncology practices across the United States versus patients in the letrozole-alone cohort of the PALOMA-2 phase 3 trial. The real-world cohort (N = 107) was derived from de-identified patient data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record database. The clinical trial cohort (N = 222) comprised postmenopausal women in the letrozole-alone arm of PALOMA-2. Patients in the real-world cohort received letrozole monotherapy per labeling and clinical judgment; patients in PALOMA-2 received letrozole 2.5 mg/d, continuous. Real-world survival and response rates were based on evidence of disease burden curated from clinician notes, radiologic reports, and pathology reports available in the electronic health record. Progression-free survival and objective response rate in PALOMA-2 were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Concordance of survival and response rates were retrospectively assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analysis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression results showed similar median progression-free survival in the real-world and PALOMA-2 cohorts (18.4 and 16.6 months, respectively): the hazard ratio using real-world data as reference was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.69-1.56). No significant difference was observed in response rates: 41.8% in the real-world cohort vs 39.4% in the PALOMA-2 cohort (odds ratio using real-world data as reference: 0.91 [95% CI, 0.57-1.44]). These findings indicate that data abstracted from electronic health records with proper quality controls can yield meaningful information on clinical outcomes. These data increase confidence in the use of real-world assessments of progression and response as efficacy endpoints. Trial registration NCT01740427; Funding: Pfizer.
Publication types
-
Clinical Trial, Phase III
-
Comparative Study
-
Multicenter Study
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
Adult
-
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal / therapeutic use*
-
Aromatase Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
-
Breast Neoplasms / drug therapy*
-
Breast Neoplasms / mortality
-
Breast Neoplasms / pathology
-
Electronic Health Records / statistics & numerical data
-
Female
-
Humans
-
Letrozole / therapeutic use*
-
Progression-Free Survival
-
Receptor, ErbB-2 / metabolism
-
Receptors, Estrogen / metabolism
-
Receptors, Progesterone / metabolism
-
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
-
United States / epidemiology
Substances
-
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
-
Aromatase Inhibitors
-
Receptors, Estrogen
-
Receptors, Progesterone
-
Letrozole
-
ERBB2 protein, human
-
Receptor, ErbB-2
Associated data
-
ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01740427
Grants and funding
These analyses and the studies included in these analyses (NCT01740427) were sponsored by Pfizer Inc. The real-world data used are derived from the Flatiron Health Analytic electronic health record database as reported in the manuscript and were purchased by Pfizer from Flatiron Health Inc., an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group. Editorial and medical writing support was provided by Catherine Grillo, of Complete Healthcare Communications, LLC (North Wales, PA), a CHC Group company, and was funded by Pfizer. The authors also wish to thank Amy P. Abernethy, MD, PhD, for her work on developing this manuscript while at Flatiron Health Inc.; Dr. Abernethy’s participation in the development of this manuscript occurred prior to her appointment as Principal Deputy Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Cynthia Huang Bartlett is a former employee of Pfizer Inc. Jack Mardekian, Matthew James Cotter, Xin Huang and Zhe Zhang are employed by Pfizer Inc. Pfizer Inc provided support in the form of salaries for authors CHB, JM, MJC, XH and ZZ, study design, data collection, and data analysis. The interpretation of the data, the content of the manuscript, and the decision to publish were at the discretion of the authors. Christina M. Parrinello and Ariel Bulua Bourla are employed by Flatiron Health. Flatiron Health provided support in the form of study design, data collection and management, and salaries for authors CMP and ABB, but did not have any additional role in the data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.