Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes in children born between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation, according to observed antenatal corticosteroids (ACS)-to-birth intervals. Research question: 'Is there a difference in short-term outcomes between observed ACS-to-birth intervals across a range of gestational ages at birth?'Methods: Cohort study assessing differences in incidence of short-term neonatal outcomes according to the observed interval between the last administration of ACS and birth. Linear, non-weighted GEE models with an independence working correlation structure were fitted to infant level data providing valid point estimates for either incidence or rate differences (binary outcomes) or average differences (continuous outcomes).Results: Of 886 children, 35.9% were born within 2 days after the last administration of ACS, 32.2% within 2 to 7 days, 14.1% within 8 to 14 days, and 17.8% more than 14 days after. Across gestational ages at birth, there were no differences in birth weight between children born at an ACS-to-birth interval of 7 days or less compared to more than 7 days, nor were there differences in respiratory outcomes, cerebral outcomes, or composite outcome.Conclusion: Drawing conclusions on the importance of the ACS-to-birth interval is difficult due to the post-hoc nature of the variable. In the absence of tools to better estimate if and when PTB will occur, it might not have any value in daily practice, regardless of whether there is an optimal ACS-to-birth interval or not.
Keywords: Preterm birth; antenatal corticosteroids; lung maturation; prematurity; short-term outcomes.