What sets the conditions for success in community-partnered evaluation work? Multiple perspectives on a small-scale research-practice partnership evaluation

J Community Psychol. 2020 Aug;48(6):1811-1824. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22372. Epub 2020 May 10.

Abstract

The goals of this study are: (a) to share reflections from multiple stakeholders involved in a foundation-funded community-partnered evaluation project, (b) to share information that might be useful to researchers, practitioners, and funders considering the merits of researcher/practitioner evaluation projects, and (c) to make specific suggestions for funders and researcher/practitioner teams starting an evaluation project. Three stakeholders in a small-scale research-practice partnership (RPP) reflected on the evaluation project by responding to three prompts. A researcher, community organization leader, and funder at a small foundation share specific tips for those considering a small-scale RPP. Engaging in a small-scale RPPs can be a very meaningful experience for individual researchers and smaller organizations and funders. The benefits and challenges align and differ in many ways with those encountered in larger projects.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Financial Management / statistics & numerical data
  • General Practitioners / economics
  • General Practitioners / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Organizations / statistics & numerical data
  • Partnership Practice / economics
  • Partnership Practice / organization & administration*
  • Research Personnel / economics
  • Research Personnel / psychology*
  • Stakeholder Participation / psychology*