The pre-Medical Emergency Team response: Nurses' decision-making escalating deterioration to treating teams using urgent review criteria

J Adv Nurs. 2020 Aug;76(8):2171-2181. doi: 10.1111/jan.14433. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

Abstract

Aim: To describe nurses' decision-making, experiences and perceptions of escalating deteriorating patients to the treating medical team using urgent clinical review criteria.

Design: A qualitative design comprising individual in-depth interviews with nurses from a major Australian metropolitan tertiary teaching hospital.

Method: A purposive sample of 30 Registered Nurses from nine surgical and medical wards were interviewed in April 2018 using semi-structured interviews. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Identified themes included: detecting the deterioration; countering the problem; getting a response; and challenges faced in the process of escalation. Nurses reported an important awareness, sense of responsibility, and critical thinking to ensure the safe management and escalation of deteriorating patients. However, barriers to escalation necessitated individual workarounds and organizational structures to mitigate patient risk.

Conclusion: This study supports the importance of communication between clinical teams and recognizes that it is crucial to enable a fail-safe experience for patients and families. Recognition of disciplinary contributions to patients' goals of care is required to better understand and address the prevalence of deteriorating patients. Our study is among the first to explore the actual experience of nurses who articulate balancing uncertainty and managing complex team dynamics on wards for patients experiencing deteriorating health status. The information may assist in determining team training strategies and structures to facilitate patient management during deterioration.

Impact: This is among the first study to investigate barriers influencing decision-making of RNs prior to escalation using qualitative methods. This study provides a foundation to inform and develop policies and strategies aimed at ensuring escalation occurs for deteriorating patients.

目的: 本研究旨在阐述护士利用紧急临床评价标准将病情恶化的患者上报给主治医疗团队的决策、经验和看法。 设计: 采用定性设计,包括对澳大利亚大都会一家重点三级教学医院的护士进行个人深入访谈。 方法: 2018年4月,采用半结构式访谈法,对来自9个外科和内科病房的30名注册护士进行了目的性抽样调查。在本研究中,进行了归纳性主题分析。 结果: 已确定的主题包括:发现病情恶化;应对问题;获得回应;在上报过程中面临的挑战。护士表示,他们对自己有深刻认知,有责任感,具有批判性思维,以确保安全管理和上报病情恶化的患者。但若在上报时遇到障碍,则需要个人采取灵活变通办法和组织结构,以降低患者的风险。 结论: 本研究对临床团队之间保持沟通的重要性予以支持,并认识到为患者及其家属提供容错体验至关重要。需要认识到专业知识对实现患者护理目标的贡献,以便更好地了解和处理病情恶化患者的发病率问题。本研究首次探索了护士在病房向健康状况恶化的患者阐明平衡不确定性和管理复杂的团队动态等方面的实际经验。这些信息可能有助于确定团队培训策略和结构,从而促进患者病情恶化期间的管理工作。 影响: 这是首次采用定性方法探讨影响注册护士在上报患者病情恶化情况之前作出决策的障碍因素的研究之一。本研究为宣传和制定一些旨在确保患者病情恶化得以上报的政策和战略提供了一个依据。.

Keywords: Registered Nurse; clinical decision-making; clinical deterioration; escalation; hospital rapid response system; hospitals; interview.

Grants and funding