Problems: Complications for newborns and postpartum clients in the hospital are more frequent after a prolonged second stage of labour. Midwives in community settings have little research to guide management in their settings.
Aim: We explored how US birth centre midwives identify onset of second stage of labour and determine when to transfer clients to the hospital for prolonged second stage.
Methods: Ethnographic interviews of midwives with at least 2 years' experience in birth centres and participant observation of birth centre care.
Findings: We interviewed 21 midwives (18 CNMs, 3 CPMs/equivalent) from 18 birth centres in 11 US states, 45% with hospital practice privileges. Midwives relied on and engaged in embodied practice in evaluating each labour and making decisions concerning management of labour. Midwives considered time a useful but limited measure as a guiding factor in management. Though ideas of time and progress do play an important role in the decision-making process of midwives, their usefulness is limited due to the continual, multifactorial, and multisensory nature of the assessment. Relationship with the transfer hospital structured midwives' decision-making about transfers.
Discussion & conclusion: These findings can inform future robust multivariate evaluation of factors, including but not limited to time, in guidelines for management of second stage of labour. Optimal management may require formal consideration of more than just time and parity. Our findings also suggest the need for evaluation of how structural issues involving hospital privileges for midwives and relationships between birth centre and hospital staff affect the well-being of childbearing families.
Keywords: Birth centres/birthing centres; Community birth; Labour; Midwives; Second stage of labour.
Copyright © 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.