Treating the SARS-CoV-2-positive patient with cancer: A proposal for a pragmatic and transparent ethical process

Cancer. 2020 Sep 1;126(17):3896-3899. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32962. Epub 2020 May 28.

Abstract

The treatment of patients with cancer who test positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses unique challenges. In this commentary, the authors describe the ethical rationale and implementation details for the creation of a novel, multidisciplinary treatment prioritization committee, including physicians, frontline staff, an ethicist, and an infectious disease expert. Organizational obligations to health care workers also are discussed. The treatment prioritization committee sets a threshold of acceptable harm to patients from decreased cancer control that is justified to reduce risk to staff. The creation of an ethical, consistent, and transparent decision-making process involving such frontline stakeholders is essential as departments across the country are faced with decisions regarding the treatment of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with cancer.

Keywords: bioethics; coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); patient safety; quality improvement; radiation oncology.

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care / ethics
  • Ambulatory Care / organization & administration
  • Betacoronavirus*
  • COVID-19
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Coronavirus Infections / complications*
  • Coronavirus Infections / virology
  • Delivery of Health Care / ethics*
  • Delivery of Health Care / organization & administration
  • Health Personnel / ethics*
  • Health Personnel / organization & administration
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms / complications*
  • Neoplasms / radiotherapy
  • Pandemics / ethics*
  • Patient Safety
  • Pneumonia, Viral / complications*
  • Pneumonia, Viral / virology
  • Quality of Health Care / ethics*
  • Quality of Health Care / organization & administration
  • SARS-CoV-2