Association of Modic change types and their short tau inversion recovery signals with clinical characteristics- a cross sectional study of chronic low back pain patients in the AIM-study

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 10;21(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03381-4.

Abstract

Background: Modic Changes (MCs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal changes in the vertebral bone marrow extending from the vertebral endplate) may represent a subgroup of nonspecific chronic low back pain that could benefit from a specific management. The primary aim was to compare clinical characteristics between patients with type 1 versus type 2 MCs. The secondary aim was to explore associations between clinical characteristics and MC related short tau inversion recovery (STIR) signals.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used baseline data prospectively collected between 2015 and 2017 on the 180 patients included in the AIM-study (Antibiotics In Modic changes), a randomized controlled trial in a Norwegian hospital out-patient setting of patients with chronic low back pain, a lumbar disc herniation within the last 2 years, low back pain intensity score ≥ 5 (on a 0-10 scale) and current type 1 or type 2 MCs at the previously herniated lumbar disc level. We used prespecified clinical characteristics including self-report measures, physiologic measures and functional measures from clinical history and examination. The diagnostic accuracy of various clinical characteristics to discriminate between patients with type 1 MCs (with or without additional type 2 MCs) and patents with type 2 MCs only (not type 1) were assessed by calculating the area under the receiver-operating curve. We assessed the correlations of clinical characteristics with details of MC related STIR signal increase.

Results: No clinical characteristic differed between patients with type 1 (n = 118) versus type 2 (but not type 1) (n = 62) MCs. The clinical characteristics showed no/minor differences or no/weak correlations with MC related STIR signal increase. Patients with a positive Springing test (at any lumbar level) had slightly less volume of STIR signal increase than those with a negative test (mean difference 1.3 on a 0-48 scale, 95% CI 0.3 to 2.3).

Conclusion: Clinical characteristics were similar for patients with type 1 MCs and patients with type 2 MCs, and showed no clinically relevant correlations with MC related STIR signal increase.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02323412, First registered 23 December 2014.

Keywords: Back pain intensity; Bone marrow edema; Clinical characteristics; Diagnostic accuracy; Low back pain; Magnetic resonance image; Modic changes; Short tau inversion recovery; Springing test.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
  • Bone Marrow / diagnostic imaging
  • Bone Marrow / drug effects*
  • Chronic Pain / diagnostic imaging
  • Chronic Pain / drug therapy*
  • Chronic Pain / physiopathology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / diagnostic imaging
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / drug therapy*
  • Intervertebral Disc Displacement / physiopathology
  • Low Back Pain / diagnostic imaging
  • Low Back Pain / drug therapy*
  • Low Back Pain / physiopathology
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / drug effects*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / physiopathology
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Norway
  • Pain Measurement
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02323412