Outcomes After Transcatheter Reintervention for Dysfunction of a Previously Implanted Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 13;13(13):1529-1540. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.035.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate outcomes following transcatheter reintervention for degenerated transcatheter pulmonary valves (TPVs).

Background: TPV replacement (TPVR) with the Melody valve demonstrated sustained relief of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstruction and pulmonary regurgitation.

Methods: All patients who underwent TPVR with a Melody valve as part of 3 Medtronic-sponsored prospective multicenter studies were included. Transcatheter reinterventions included balloon dilation of the previously implanted Melody valve, placement of a bare-metal stent within the implanted TPV, or placement of a new TPV in the RVOT (TPV-in-TPV). Indications for reintervention, decisions to reintervene, and the method of reintervention were at physician discretion. All patients provided written informed consent to participate in the trials, and each trial was approved by local or central Institutional Review Boards or ethics committees at participating sites.

Results: A total of 309 patients who underwent TPVR were discharged from the implantation hospitalization with Melody valves in place. Transcatheter reintervention on the TPV was performed in 46 patients. The first transcatheter reintervention consisted of TPV-in-TPV in 28 patients (median 6.9 years [quartile 1 to quartile 3: 5.2 to 7.8 years] after TPVR), simple balloon dilation of the implanted Melody valve in 17 (median 4.9 years [quartile 1 to quartile 3: 4.0 to 6.0 years] after TPVR), and bare-metal stent placement alone in 1 (4.4 years after TPVR). There were no major procedural complications. Overall, 4-year freedom from explant and from any later RVOT reintervention after the first reintervention were 83% and 60%, respectively. Freedom from repeat RVOT reintervention was longer in patients undergoing TPV-in-TPV than balloon dilation (71% vs. 46% at 4 years; p = 0.027).

Conclusions: TPV-in-TPV can be an effective and durable treatment for Melody valve dysfunction. Although balloon dilation of the Melody valve was also acutely effective at reducing RVOT obstruction, the durability of this therapy was limited in this cohort compared with TPV-in-TPV.

Keywords: Melody valve; balloon dilation; pulmonary valve replacement; pulmonary valvuloplasty.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Video-Audio Media

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Balloon Valvuloplasty
  • Cardiac Catheterization / adverse effects
  • Cardiac Catheterization / instrumentation*
  • Child
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Failure*
  • Pulmonary Valve / diagnostic imaging
  • Pulmonary Valve / physiopathology
  • Pulmonary Valve / surgery*
  • Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency / diagnostic imaging
  • Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency / physiopathology
  • Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency / surgery*
  • Recovery of Function
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Outflow Obstruction / diagnostic imaging
  • Ventricular Outflow Obstruction / physiopathology
  • Ventricular Outflow Obstruction / surgery*
  • Young Adult