Emergency airway training: "Who are you going to FONA?"

Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov;45(6):889-895. doi: 10.1111/coa.13621. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

Abstract

Objectives: To demonstrate face and content validity of a home-made simulation model as a training tool for front of neck access (FONA) procedures.

Design: This was a prospective evaluation study, in which experienced otolaryngologists and trainees were recruited to complete 3 tasks using our FONA model.

Setting: The study was completed during regular simulation training days and international conferences.

Participants: A total of 52 participants completed the questionnaire and were included in the study; 25 were experts and 27 were trainees.

Main outcome measures: All participants completed a validated 15-item questionnaire using a 5-point likert scale to assess the model across 4 domains: face validity (FV), global content (GC), task-specific content (TSC) and curriculum applicability (CTR).

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups ratings for FV, GC, TSC or CTR (P = .76, .13, .4 and .67, respectively). The model achieved a median FV of 4 (IQR 4-5) with the agreement of experienced and trainee groups (68.9% and 92%, respectively). The median GC validity score was 5 (IQR 4-5) with the agreement of 87.6% and 98.4% in respected groups. The model achieved a median TSC of 4.8 (IQR 4-5) with the agreement of 54.5% and 99% in respected groups. The median CTR score was 5 (IQR 4-5) with the agreement of 54.4% and 100% in respected groups.

Conclusion: Our home-made FONA model achieved face and content validity for training and is safe and affordable for teaching basic front of neck access skills to otolaryngology trainees.

Keywords: front of neck access; simulation; tracheostomy.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Airway Management / standards*
  • Clinical Competence
  • Emergency Medicine / education*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Otolaryngology / education*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Simulation Training / methods*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires