A cost-effectiveness analysis of genomic sequencing in a prospective versus historical cohort of complex pediatric patients

Genet Med. 2020 Dec;22(12):1986-1993. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0929-8. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Abstract

Purpose: Cost-effectiveness evaluations of first-line genomic sequencing (GS) in the diagnosis of children with genetic conditions are limited by the lack of well-defined comparative cohorts. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early GS in pediatric patients with complex monogenic conditions compared with a matched historical cohort.

Methods: Data, including investigation costs, were collected in a prospective cohort of 92 pediatric patients undergoing singleton GS over an 18-month period (2016-2017) with two of the following: a condition with high mortality, multisystem disease involving three or more organs, or severe limitation of daily function. Comparative data were collected in a matched historical cohort who underwent traditional investigations in the years 2012-2013.

Results: GS yielded a diagnosis in 42% while traditional investigations yielded a diagnosis in 23% (p = 0.003). A change in management was experienced by 74% of patients diagnosed following GS, compared with 32% diagnosed following traditional investigations. Singleton GS at a cost of AU$3100 resulted in a mean saving per person of AU$3602 (95% confidence interval [CI] AU$2520-4685). Cost savings occurred across all investigation subtypes and were only minimally offset by clinical management costs.

Conclusion: GS in complex pediatric patients saves significant costs and doubles the diagnostic yield of traditional approaches.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; exome sequencing; genomic sequencing; monogenic; pediatric.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Chromosome Mapping
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Exome*
  • Genomics*
  • Humans
  • Prospective Studies