Selective fetal reduction in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: A comparison of techniques

Prenat Diagn. 2021 Jan;41(1):52-60. doi: 10.1002/pd.5830. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

Objective: To compare perinatal outcomes associated with three methods of selective reduction in complicated monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies: bipolar cord coagulation (BC), fetoscopic or ultrasound guided laser cord occlusion and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of complicated MC twin pregnancies undergoing selective fetal reduction at a tertiary fetal center over a 20-year period. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were compared.

Results: 105 procedures met inclusion criteria: 74 RFAs, 17 lasers and 14 BCs. Procedure duration was significantly shorter for RFA (27.4 ± 15.8 minutes) compared to BC (91.7 ± 38.7 minutes) and laser (83.4 ± 40.4 minutes), P < .0001). The incidence of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) and co-twin demise did not differ between groups, however preterm delivery <34 weeks occurred less frequently following RFA (29.7%), compared to laser (64.7%) or BC (42.9%) (P = .02); delivery <37 weeks was also less frequent following RFA (45.9%), compared to laser (76.5%) or BC (78.6%)(P = .01). The difference in preterm birth<34 weeks between RFA and laser was maintained after adjusting for cord occlusion indication and amnionicity (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.27-12.31).

Conclusions: In our experience, RFA procedures were simpler, faster and associated with a lower risk of preterm delivery <34 and <37 weeks, compared to laser or BC.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Electrocoagulation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laser Therapy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Ontario / epidemiology
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Outcome / epidemiology*
  • Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal / methods*
  • Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal / statistics & numerical data
  • Pregnancy, Twin
  • Radiofrequency Ablation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional