Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit

Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Sep 21;73(suppl 4):e20190679. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0679. eCollection 2020.
[Article in English, Portuguese]

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the clinical conditions and the risk classification of children and adolescents treated in a hospital emergency, according to the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol.

Method: cross-sectional study, with 200 participants, using an instrument based on the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol and using odds ratio for the analysis.

Results: most participants were male patients in early childhood and who were or weren't in daycare. As for clinical conditions, most showed changes in vital (24.5%) and respiratory (20.0%) signs, most patients (57.5%) did not present pain; 35.5% were classified as urgent and 45.0% as non-urgent. There was a greater chance of being classified as very urgent (orange) when compared to non-urgent (blue).

Conclusion: the protocol used contributed to an effective classification and was considered a valid and reliable health technology for determining the priority of care.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Emergencies*
  • Emergency Service, Hospital*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Odds Ratio
  • Pain