Are classic metaphyseal lesions pathognomonic for child abuse? Two cases of motor vehicle collision-related extremity CML and a review of the literature

J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Aug:74:102006. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102006. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Abstract

Long bone fractures at the infant growth plate, known as classic metaphyseal lesions (CMLs), raise a strong suspicion for abusive injury. CMLs persist as a hallmark for inflicted injury although a handful of documented cases of CMLs created by other, non-abusive mechanisms within various healthcare settings are scattered throughout the past few decades of medical literature. The forces required to sustain a CML are typically defined as a combination of tensile, compressive, or rotational energy applied to the metaphyseal regions of an infant's long bones. Recently, two separate child protection teams each encountered a case of CML discovered after reported motor vehicle collisions (MVC). This provoked a critical appraisal of the medical literature to inform clinical practice regarding MVCs as a potential mechanism for this fracture type and to remind clinicians that there is no single injury pathognomonic for abuse.

Keywords: Abuse; Accidental injury; Classic metaphyseal fractures; Motor vehicle collisions.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Accidents, Traffic*
  • Child Abuse / diagnosis
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Femur / diagnostic imaging
  • Femur / injuries*
  • Growth Plate / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Radiography
  • Radius Fractures / diagnostic imaging*
  • Radius Fractures / etiology
  • Salter-Harris Fractures / diagnostic imaging*
  • Salter-Harris Fractures / etiology