Trends in de-lousing of Norwegian farmed salmon from 2000-2019-Consumption of medicines, salmon louse resistance and non-medicinal control methods

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0240894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240894. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis has been a substantial obstacle in Norwegian farming of Atlantic salmon for decades. With a limited selection of available medicines and frequent delousing treatments, resistance has emerged among salmon lice. Surveillance of salmon louse sensitivity has been in place since 2013, and consumption of medicines has been recorded since the early 80's. The peak year for salmon lice treatments was 2015, when 5.7 times as many tonnes of salmonids were treated compared to harvested. In recent years, non-medicinal methods of delousing farmed fish have been introduced to the industry. By utilizing data on the annual consumption of medicines, annual frequency of medicinal and non-medicinal treatments, the aim of the current study was to describe the causative factors behind salmon lice sensitivity in the years 2000-2019, measured through toxicity tests-bioassays. The sensitivity data from 2000-2012 demonstrate the early emergence of resistance in salmon lice along the Norwegian coast. Reduced sensitivity towards azamethiphos, deltamethrin and emamectin benzoate was evident from 2009, 2009 and 2007, respectively. The annual variation in medicine consumption and frequency of medicinal treatments correlated well with the evolution in salmon louse sensitivity. The patterns are similar, with a relatively small response delay from the decline in the consumption of medicines in Norway (2016 and onward) to the decline in measured resistance among salmon louse (2017 and onward). 2017 was the first year in which non-medicinal treatments outnumbered medicinal delousing treatments as well as the peak year in numbers of cleanerfish deployed. This study highlights the significance of avoiding heavy reliance on a few substance groups to combat ectoparasites, this can be a potent catalyst for resistance evolution. Further, it demonstrates the importance of transparency in the global industry, which enables the industry to learn from poor choices in the past.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antiparasitic Agents / adverse effects*
  • Antiparasitic Agents / pharmacology
  • Aquaculture
  • Drug Resistance / genetics*
  • Fish Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Fish Diseases / parasitology
  • Fisheries
  • Humans
  • Norway
  • Organothiophosphates / adverse effects
  • Organothiophosphates / pharmacology
  • Phthiraptera / drug effects
  • Phthiraptera / pathogenicity
  • Salmo salar / growth & development*
  • Salmo salar / parasitology
  • Seafood

Substances

  • Antiparasitic Agents
  • Organothiophosphates
  • azamethiphos

Grants and funding

The study was financially supported by the Norwegian Research Council through the Centre for Innovation, Sea Lice Research Centre, grant number NFR 203513/O30. This funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript, and provided only financial support in the form of salaries to [EMJ]. One of the authors of the study [SS] is employed by the commercial company VESO, Oslo, Norway, and contributed to study design, data collection and preparation of the manuscript. The company VESO, however, had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. The specific role of each author is articulated in the ’author contributions’ section.