Objectives: It has been reported that successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (CTO-PCI) might be associated with symptom relief, a lower rate of subsequent myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and improved long-term survival, compared with unsuccessful PCI for CTO. However, the long-term benefit of percutaneous recanalization of CTO remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the long-term benefit of percutaneous recanalization of CTO.
Methods: We analyzed consecutive cases of CTO-PCI performed between January 2000 and December 2006. The health status of all patients on September 2017 was obtained via letter or from medical records. We collected relevant patient information as well as angiographic and procedural characteristics.
Results: A total of 477 patients (82.8% men, mean age, 65.7 years) underwent CTO-PCI. The procedural was successful in 382 cases (80.3%). Reference vessel diameter, occlusion length and angiographic stump of CTO site were associated with the success of CTO intervention. During the mean follow-up period of 139.8 months, successful CTO-PCI was associated with a higher survival rate when compared with failed CTO-PCI (Log-rank test: P = 0.0147). When categorized by target vessel, successful revascularization of left anterior descending (LAD) -CTO improved long-term survival (Log-rank test: P = 0.0041). On the other hand, successful revascularization of right coronary artery or left circumflex -CTO was not associated with improved long-term survival [Log-rank test: P = 0.5631 (RCA), P = 0.2774 (LCX)].
Conclusions: Successful CTO-PCI, especially the successful revascularization of LAD-CTO, improved long-term survival of patients.
Keywords: Chronic total occlusion; Long term follow-up; PCI.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.