Diagnostic performance of prostate cancer antigen 3 and the Prostate Health Index in detecting overall and clinically significant prostate cancer in men at first biopsy: A meta-analysis

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of prostate cancer antigen 3 and the Prostate Health Index for the detection of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer at initial biopsy.

Methods: A search was conducted in the online databases PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane database, and relevant articles published up to 23 February 2020 were extracted.

Results: Twenty studies including 10 376 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.57) and 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.75) for prostate cancer antigen 3 and 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.86-0.90) and 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.34-0.38) for the Prostate Health Index. The area under the curve was 0.72 for prostate cancer antigen 3 and 0.76 for the Prostate Health Index. The combination of prostate cancer antigen 3 and the Prostate Health Index had a higher area under the curve (0.79) and diagnostic odds ratio (5.83) than the use of Prostate Health Index (area under the curve 0.75, diagnostic odds ratio 4.69) or prostate cancer antigen 3 (area under the curve 0.77, diagnostic odds ratio 4.84) alone. For clinically significant prostate cancer detection, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.84) and 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.50-0.55), respectively, for prostate cancer antigen 3, and 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.82) and 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.67), respectively, for the Prostate Health Index. The area under the curve was 0.71 for prostate cancer antigen 3 and 0.77 for the Prostate Health Index.

Conclusion: Both the Prostate Health Index and prostate cancer antigen 3 showed acceptable and similar results for the detection of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. A combination of these two diagnostic tests may be more helpful than the use of either test alone in prostate cancer management.