Aims: To compare factors associated with the sedentary lifestyle described in the literature with the factors listed in NANDA International.
Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of factors associated with a sedentary lifestyle in adolescents, adults and older people.
Data sources: An electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Latin America and the Caribbean Literature on Health and Science databases conducted in May 2016.
Review methods: Descriptive data were extracted according to a standardized form. The odds ratios for each etiological factor associated with a sedentary lifestyle were extracted directly from the articles or calculated from the data described therein. The meta-analysis was conducted for factors that were investigated in more than one study.
Results: Thirty-five articles were included. The statistically significant factors were: lack of social support, of physical space, of time, of motivation, of sports skills and of interest in physical activity, intolerance to activity, being retired, living in a low-income country, laziness, not having a job/studying, low socioeconomic status and level of knowledge about physical activity, female gender, living in an urban area, negative self-perception of health, using public transportation, being in the oldest age group in the study and perceived physical disability.
Conclusion: The new factors associated with a sedentary lifestyle and those already included in the NANDA International classification will lead to better clinical guidance for nurses.
Impact: Knowledge about these factors can contribute directly to public health policies.
目的: 将文献中描述的与久坐不动的生活方式相关的因素与NANDA International中列出的因素进行比较。 设计: 对青少年、成年人和老年人久坐不动的生活方式相关因素进行系统评估和荟萃分析。 数据来源: 2016年5月对PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL以及拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的健康与科学文献数据库进行了电子检索。 评估方法: 根据标准化形式提取描述性数据。与久坐不动的生活方式相关的每种病因的比值比直接从文献中提取或从其中描述的数据中计算得出。对一项以上研究中调查的因素进行了荟萃分析。 结果: 纳入了35篇文章。具有统计学意义的因素包括: 缺乏社会支持、缺乏实际空间、时间、动力、运动技能以及对体育活动的兴趣、对活动的不耐受、退休、生活在低收入国家、懒惰、没有工作/学习、社会经济地位地下、缺乏体育活动知识、女性、生活在城市地区、对健康的负面自我认知、使用公共交通工具、在研究中属于年龄最大的群体以及感知的身体残疾。 结论: 与久坐不动的生活方式相关的新因素以及已经纳入NANDA International分类的那些因素将为护士提供更好的临床指导。 影响: 对这些因素的了解可直接促进公共卫生政策的制定。.
Keywords: literature review; meta-analysis; nursing; sedentary lifestyle; systematic review.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.