Context: Molecular testing to refine the diagnosis of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules has become increasingly popular, but data on long-term durability of test results and the rate of delayed operation are limited.
Objective: Determine the delayed rate of surgical resection in indeterminate nodules with benign/negative molecular testing and the risk of false-negative molecular test results.
Design: Prospective follow-up of the Gene Expression Classifier vs Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Management of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules randomized controlled trial comparing the diagnostic test performance of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier and ThyroSeq v2.
Setting: University of California, Los Angeles.
Participants: Patients who underwent thyroid biopsy with indeterminate (Bethesda III/IV) cytology (April 2016 to July 2017).
Intervention: Ultrasound surveillance.
Main outcome measure: False-negative rate of molecular testing.
Results: Of 95 indeterminate nodules with negative/benign molecular test results, 12 nodules underwent immediate resection (11 benign nodules, 1 noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm nodule with papillary-like nuclear features). Nonoperative management was pursued for 83 (87.4%) nodules. The median surveillance was 26.7 months. Ten nodules were resected during surveillance and malignancy was identified in 4 nodules (overall false-negative rate of 5.8%). In the 4 malignant nodules that underwent delayed operation, surgery was prompted by sonographic changes during surveillance.
Conclusions: The majority of indeterminate nodules with negative molecular testing have a stable clinical course over 3 years of follow-up, but our finding of a 6% false-negative rate highlights the importance of continuing sonographic surveillance. Long-term studies are needed to determine the optimal length of follow-up.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02681328.
Keywords: indeterminate nodules; molecular testing; nonoperative; surveillance; thyroid; thyroid cancer.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].