Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes With Physical Function After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is successful by both subjective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective functional improvements of gait. Each is reproducible and valid, but they are entirely distinct methods. This study investigated the correlation between subjective and objective outcomes of TAA.

Methods: Seventy patients underwent gait analysis preoperatively and 1 year after TAA. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and visual analog score (VAS) for pain and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scores were recorded at each interval. A Student t test, a multivariate regression, and a Pearson correlation coefficient were used to measure the correlation between parameters of gait and PROMs.

Results: Patients had statistically significant improvements in gait velocity, total range of motion (ROM), maximum plantarflexion, ankle power, and SF-36 Physical, VAS, and AOFAS scores. The SF-36 Physical score had a moderate positive correlation with preoperative walking speed, step length, and ankle power and postoperative walking speed and ankle power. No correlation between VAS score and function was detected. The AOFAS score had a moderate positive correlation with postoperative walking speed, step length, and ankle power, and improvement in walking speed, cadence, and ankle power.

Conclusion: Statistically significant correlations were found between numerous preoperative and postoperative comparisons of PROMs and the AOFAS score with the objective biomechanical outcomes of gait. Walking speed and ankle push-off power correlated most with patient perceptions of function and improvement, while pain and ROM did not. Subjective PROMs and objective biomechanical outcomes were complementary in the assessment of surgical outcomes and, combined, helped to address the dilemma of the confounding effect of other lower extremity pathologies on PROMs.

Level of evidence: Level III, comparative series.