Background: We aimed to identify risk factors and risk scoring models to help identify post-traumatic pulmonary embolisms (PE).
Methods: We performed a retrospective review (2014-2019) of all adult trauma patients admitted to our Level I trauma center that received a CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) for a suspected PE. A systematic literature search found eleven risk scoring models, all of which were applied to these patients. Scores of patients with and without PE were compared.
Results: Of the 235 trauma patients that received CTPA, 31 (13%) showed a PE. No risk scoring model had both a sensitivity and specificity above 90%. The Wells Score had the highest area under the curve (0.65). After logistic regression, no risk scoring model variables were independently associated with PE.
Conclusions: In trauma patients with clinically suspected PE, clinical variables and current risk scoring models do not adequately differentiate patients with and without PE.
Keywords: Embolism; Prediction; Pulmonary; Risk; Score; Trauma.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.