Mechanical properties and progressive failure characteristics of sandstone containing elliptical and square openings subjected to biaxial stress

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0246815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246815. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Two kinds of common tunnel shapes, i.e. elliptical opening and square opening were selected for biaxial compression tests, and the influences of two kinds of opening shapes on the mechanical properties, failure characteristics and failure modes of sandstone were compared and analyzed. The complex variable theory and mapping functions were used to obtain the analytical stress solution around elliptical and square openings. The results show that the stability of the specimen containing an elliptical opening was better than that of the specimen containing a square opening under the same lateral stress. Compared with the elliptical opening, the local damage was formed earlier in the square opening which might be caused by a higher stress concentration around the square opening. The stress distributions around openings were influenced by the opening shape and lateral stress coefficient. The top and bottom of square opening were more prone to tensile fracture, and the distribution range of tensile was larger than that of elliptical opening. When the opening failed, the intensity of square opening failure was weaker than that of elliptical opening. On the basis of the average frequency value and the rise angle value, the failure mode of specimen containing elliptical or square opening was distinguished. It was found that the mixed tension and shear failure dominated the failure of specimens with different opening shapes, and the number of shear cracks in the specimen containing a square opening was greater than that in the specimen containing an elliptical opening. The above method of judging failure mode by acoustic emission signals was well verified by the CT images of damaged specimens.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Materials Testing
  • Stress, Mechanical*
  • Tensile Strength

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing (Nos. CYB19045). Chongqing University is the first author’s learning unit. It provides support to the first author in the form of material reimbursement, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.