Toxicity of sodium nitrite-based vertebrate pesticides for European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris)

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0246277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246277. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

In the 21st century, invasive animals rank second only to habitat destruction as the greatest threat to global biodiversity. Socially-acceptable and cost-effective strategies are needed to reduce the negative economic and environmental impacts of invasive animals. We investigated the potential for sodium nitrite (SN; CAS 7632-00-0) to serve as an avian toxicant for European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris L.). We also assessed the non-target hazard of an experimental formulation of SN that is being developed as a toxicant for invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa L.). In gavage experiments with European starlings, we identified a lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) for mortality of 2.40% technical SN (w/v; 120 mg SN/kg body mass) and a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for mortality of 1.30% technical SN (65 mg/kg). The exposure of ten starlings to the experimental formulation of SN (10% SN pig toxicant) resulted in one starling mortality during four days of exposure to the toxic bait. Sodium nitrite toxicity presented a moderate hazard to European starlings; thus, the future development of SN as an avian toxicant is dependent upon its cost-effectiveness. We discuss the management of toxic effects and non-target hazards of SN for wild birds, including best practices for toxic baiting of vertebrate pests and management of invasive wild pigs.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Introduced Species
  • Male
  • Pesticides / toxicity*
  • Sodium Nitrite / toxicity*
  • Starlings*
  • Toxicity Tests

Substances

  • Pesticides
  • Sodium Nitrite

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.13622666

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC). Experiments 1–3 were supported by a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between NWRC, and the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre (Invasive Animals Limited, Australia; https://invasives.com.au) and Animal Control Technologies (Australia; https://animalcontrol.com.au/; the ACTA was a partner in the IACRC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.