Women's experiences of counselling in cases of a screen-positive prenatal screening result

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0247164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247164. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Objective: To study women's apprehensions, understanding and experiences of counselling concerning a screen-positive result in screening for fetal chromosomal defects.

Methods: A questionnaire study including different steps of the prenatal screening process was carried out in Helsinki University Hospital. Women's experiences concerning counselling immediately after a screen-positive result and during further examinations in the Fetal Medicine Unit (FMU) were analyzed.

Results: 143 women filled in the questionnaire. Less than half of the women considered the primary counselling after a screen-positive result to be explicit (43.9%) and sufficient (43.1%). In the FMU, 88.3% and 89.8% of women were satisfied with the explicitness and sufficiency of counselling. Most women (75%) experienced worry before further examinations but less than half (45%) had considered their personal values concerning diagnostic tests. Half (50.5%) of women expected the worry to continue even if diagnostic tests turn out normal. Most (81%) women were aware that diagnostic tests are voluntary and were confident (85.3%) with their decision to participate.

Conclusions: After a screen-positive result, women have unanswered questions, experience anxiety and confusion. The possibility of an abnormal screening result is not seriously considered beforehand. To enable an informed consent for prenatal screening, improvements in prescreening counselling during the first visits of antenatal care need to be made.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anxiety / etiology
  • Anxiety / psychology*
  • Chromosome Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Counseling / methods*
  • Decision Making
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Maternal Health Services
  • Patient Satisfaction / statistics & numerical data
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / psychology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Grants and funding

Author LV received 1500 euros from the Helsinki University Research fund (https://www.helsinki.fi/en/research/research-environment/research-funding). Open access publication was funded by the Helsinki University Library. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.