Background: The decision to initiate second-line treatment in children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is complex and involves many different factors.
Methods: In this prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of 120 children from 21 centers, the factors contributing to the decision to start second-line treatments for ITP were captured. At study entry, clinicians were given a curated list of 12 potential reasons the patient required a second-line treatment. Clinicians selected all that applied and ranked the top three reasons.
Results: Quality of life (QOL) was the most frequently cited reason for starting a second-line therapy. Clinicians chose it as a reason to treat in 88/120 (73%) patients, as among the top three reasons in 68/120 (57%), and as the top reason in 32/120 (27%). Additional factors ranked as the top reason to start second-line treatment included severity of bleeding (22/120, 18%), frequency of bleeding (19/120, 16%), and severity of thrombocytopenia (18/120, 15%). Patients for whom QOL (p = .006) or sports participation (p = .02) were ranked reasons were more likely to have chronic ITP, whereas those for whom severity (p = .003) or frequency (p = .005) of bleeding were ranked reasons were more likely to have newly diagnosed or persistent ITP. Parental anxiety, though rarely the primary impetus for treatment, was frequently cited (70/120, 58%) as a contributing factor.
Conclusion: Perceived QOL is the most frequently selected reason pediatric patients start second-line therapies for ITP. It is critical that studies of treatments for childhood ITP include assessments of their effects on QOL.
Keywords: bleeding; children; immune thrombocytopenia; quality of life; treatment.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.