Background: Intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of metacarpal fractures is an alternative to Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of K-wire fixation with a threaded IMN (InNate; ExsoMed, Aliso Viejo, California).
Methods: The study design was based on previously described biomechanical models for evaluating metacarpal fractures. Sixteen fresh frozen small finger-matched and ring finger-matched pairs were randomized to either IMN or 0.045 in K-wire fixation after receiving a standardized neck osteotomy. Proper implant placement was confirmed with plain radiographs. Specimens then underwent loading in a 3-point bend configuration. Load to failure (LTF), stiffness, and fracture displacement were recorded. Mechanical failure was defined by a sharp change in the load-displacement curve.
Results: Age, sex, sidedness (left or right), and digit (ring or small finger) were evenly distributed between groups. The IMN had a significantly higher LTF than K-wires (546 N vs 154 N, P < .001). The K-wire fixation demonstrated plastic deformation between 75 and 150 N. Intramedullary nail stiffness was higher than that of K-wires (155.89 N/mm vs 59.28 N/mm, P < .001).
Conclusions: When surgical fixation is indicated for metacarpal neck and shaft fractures, the threaded IMN is biomechanically superior to crossed K-wires with the application of 3-point bend.
Keywords: K-wires; biomechanical study; intramedullary fixation; metacarpal fractures.