Purpose: With rising healthcare costs and insurance push against non-emergent hospital admission, lower extremity fracture treatment is shifting toward outpatient procedures over inpatient hospitalizations. This study compares outcomes for fractures treated as inpatient versus outpatient.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of lower extremity fracture patients. We collected demographics, injury information, hospital course, and complication data. Length of stay was categorized as "inpatient" and "outpatient" based a 24-h hospital stay cutoff. Data analysis included differences between cohorts with regards to readmissions and complications.
Results: We identified 229 patients who met inclusion criteria. Inpatient versus outpatient status was predictive of in-hospital complications; however, inpatient versus outpatient status did not predict 1-year readmission.
Conclusion: Outpatient surgery is safe and effective. As the population increases and ages, low-risk surgeries should be considered for outpatient rather than inpatient stays to lower costs, save resources, and reduce complications.
Keywords: Inpatient; Outpatient; ‘Hospital costs’; ‘Lower extremity, fractures’.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.