Similar 90-day outcomes among inpatient and outpatient arthroplasties : a single-surgeon matched cohort analysis

Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7 Supple B):84-90. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2341.R1.

Abstract

Aims: The proportion of arthroplasties performed in the ambulatory setting has increased considerably. However, there are concerns whether same-day discharge may increase the risk of complications. The aim of this study was to compare 90-day outcomes between inpatient arthroplasties and outpatient arthroplasties performed at an ambulatory surgery centre (ASC), and determine whether there is a learning curve associated with performing athroplasties in an ASC.

Methods: Among a single-surgeon cohort of 970 patients who underwent arthroplasty at an ASC, 854 (88.0%) were matched one-to-one with inpatients based on age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, BMI, and procedure (105 could not be adequately matched and 11 lacked 90-day follow-up). The cohort included 281 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) (32.9%), 267 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (31.3%), 242 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) (28.3%), 60 hip resurfacings (7.0%), two revision THAs (0.3%), and two revision TKAs (0.3%). Outcomes included readmissions, reoperations, visits to the emergency department, unplanned clinic visits, and complications.

Results: The inpatient and outpatient groups were similar in all demographic variables, reflecting successful matching. The reoperation rate was 0.9% in both cohorts (p = 1.000). Rates of readmission (2.0% inpatient vs 1.6% outpatient), any complications (5.9% vs 5.6%), minor complications (4.2% vs 3.9%), visits to the emergency department (2.7% vs 1.4%), and unplanned clinic visits (5.7% vs 5.5%) were lower in the outpatient group but did not reach significance with the sample size studied. A learning curve may exist, as seen by significant reductions in the reoperation and overall complication rates among outpatient arthroplasties over time (p = 0.032 and p = 0.007, respectively), despite those in this group becoming significantly older and heavier (both p < 0.001) during the study period.

Conclusion: Arthroplasties performed at ASCs appear to be safe in appropriately selected patients, but may be associated with a learning curve as shown by the significant decrease in complication and reoperation rates during the study period. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):84-90.

Keywords: ASC; Ambulatory surgery center; Arthroplasty; Hip resurfacing; Inpatient versus outpatient; Outpatient; Outpatient arthroplasty; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Emergency Service, Hospital / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Hip Prosthesis
  • Hospitalization*
  • Humans
  • Learning Curve
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Readmission / statistics & numerical data
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data