A qualitative exploration of men's perceptions of the terms "male sterilization" versus "vasectomy" in the southern United States

Objectives: Clinical literature and contraception information guides use the terms "male sterilization" and "vasectomy" interchangeably. We investigate the meanings men attach to "sterilization" and how those meanings compare to perceptions of "vasectomy."

Study design: Cisgender, heterosexual men, ages 25 to 67, living across seven U.S. southern states participated in individual telephone interviews from May to December 2019. Interviews explored men's experiences with contraception, including their perception of the term "sterilization." We audio-recorded and transcribed the interviews and conducted thematic analyses using an inductive approach.

Results: While most participants described "vasectomy" as a relatively benign procedure, they described "sterilization" as "sinister," "bleak," and "barbaric." Participants' discussions of sterilization invoked associations with eugenicist practices and specific historical examples of forced sterilization. While some participants recognized that vasectomy is a means of achieving sterilization, most viewed the term "sterilization" as incongruous with the modern medical procedure of "vasectomy," precisely because sterilization has been used as a form of reproductive oppression.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that men have strong affective responses to the term "sterilization." Participants' knowledge of historical eugenicist practices has implications for the acceptability of vasectomy as a permanent contraceptive option in our contemporary context.

Implications: The phrase "male sterilization" can be associated with eugenics and coercive reproductive practices. Using the term for reproductive counselling, education, or research purposes may have implications for the acceptability of vasectomy as a permanent contraceptive option.