Abstract
We compared pathogen detection between saliva, nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs in children with respiratory symptoms. The sensitivity in nasopharyngeal swabs was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78%-98%), in oropharyngeal swabs 79% (95% CI: 60%-90%), in saliva overall 76% (95% CI: 58%-88%) and in 18 saliva samples collected with drooling or sponges, 94% (95% CI: 74%-99%). Saliva could be a relevant specimen alternative.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication types
-
Comparative Study
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
Adolescent
-
Bordetella pertussis / genetics
-
Bordetella pertussis / pathogenicity
-
Child
-
Child, Preschool
-
Clinical Laboratory Techniques / methods
-
Clinical Laboratory Techniques / standards*
-
Female
-
Humans
-
Infant
-
Male
-
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
-
Mycoplasma pneumoniae / genetics
-
Mycoplasma pneumoniae / pathogenicity
-
Nasopharynx / microbiology
-
Nasopharynx / virology
-
Oropharynx / microbiology
-
Oropharynx / virology
-
Prospective Studies
-
Respiratory Tract Infections / diagnosis*
-
Respiratory Tract Infections / microbiology
-
Respiratory Tract Infections / virology
-
Saliva / microbiology*
-
Saliva / virology*
-
Sensitivity and Specificity
-
Specimen Handling
-
Viruses / classification
-
Viruses / genetics*
-
Viruses / pathogenicity