Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review

Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Sep 28;101(9):adv00559. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3884.

Abstract

By relying on data from existing patient-reported outcome measures of quality of life, the true impact of skin conditions on patients' lives may be underestimated. This study systematically reviewed all dermatology-specific (used across skin conditions) patient-reported outcome measures and makes evidence-based recommendations for their use. The study protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018108829). PubMed, PsycInfo and CINAHL were searched from inception to 25 June 2018. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria were used to assess the measurement properties and methodological quality of studies. A total of 12,925 abstracts were identified. Zero patient-reported outcome measures were assigned to category A (ready for use without further validation), 31 to category B (recommended for use, but only with further validation) and 5 to category C (not recommended for use). There is no gold-standard dermatology-specific patient-reported outcome measure that can be recommended or used without caution. A new measure that can comprehensively capture the impact of dermatological conditions on the patient's life is needed.

Keywords: burden; dermatology-specific; measurement properties; quality of life; patient-reported outcome measures.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Consensus
  • Dermatology*
  • Humans
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Quality of Life*