Background: Multiple device passes are associated with complications and poor functional outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO).
Objective: To characterize the relationship between number of device passes, complications, angiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes in MT for ELVO.
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Individual device passes for MT were evaluated for any change in Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score, successful revascularization (TICI 2b or 3), and complications. Outcomes were compared among groups requiring multiple passes with various cut-off points. Risk factors for unfavorable clinical outcome [90 day modified Rankin Scale > 2] were assessed using multivariate analysis.
Results: Successful revascularization was achieved in 75% of 163 patients and 36% required only one device pass. After the second pass, the likelihood of angiographic improvement significantly decreased (p < 0.001). Using multiple cut-off points, higher post-procedural NIHSS scores, mortality rates, and unfavorable 90-day outcomes were associated with a greater number of passes. Multivariate analysis revealed ICA thrombus (comparison: M2, OR: 25, 95% CI 2-275, p = 0.01) and failed revascularization (OR: 68, 95% CI 3.12-1489, p = 0.01) as the only significant predictors of unfavorable clinical outcome. Nonetheless, the likelihood of favorable clinical outcome was higher in patients with an ICA occlusion who were revascularized in < 2 vs. ≥ 2 (44 vs 4%, p = 0.01) or < 3 vs. ≥ 3 (32 vs. 0%, p = 0.02) passes.
Conclusion: The likelihood of angiographic improvement in patients with ELVO significantly decreases after the second pass. A greater number of passes is associated with worsened clinical outcomes.
Keywords: ADAPT; Acute ischemic stroke; Large vessel occlusion; Mechanical thrombectomy; Revascularization; Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.