Comparison of five diagnostic flow cytometry scores in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Diagnostic power and prognostic impact

Background: Flow cytometry (FCM) is a co-criterion in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) diagnostics according to the WHO classification. The presented study compared diagnostic power and prognostic impact of different FCM-based scores.

Methods: A total of 807 bone marrow (BM) samples of patients with cytopenia (543 MDS, 153 non-clonal cytopenias, 111 non-MDS myeloid malignancies) and 78 healthy controls have been investigated using a standardized 8-color-FCM procedure. FCSS, Ogata-score, iFS, RED-score, and ELN-NEC were analyzed for sensitivity and specificity in comparison to standard diagnostic tools. Median follow up for patients was 26 month (range: 0.2-89).

Results: The iFS showed the highest accuracy (80%) with the best balance between sensitivity (79%) and specificity (86%). This was also valid in MDS with very low IPSS-R and even in MDS without ring sideroblasts, with normal blast count and karyotype, where iFS could confirm diagnosis in 62% and 65% of patients. Besides the high diagnostic power, the established iFS category "consistent with MDS" was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) independent from WHO classification (median: 51 month vs. not reached, p < 0.0001). Remarkably, this iFS category redefined a subgroup of patients with worse OS within IPSS-R low-risk category (73 month vs. not reached, p = 0.0433). Finally, multivariable analysis showed that iFS added independent prognostic information regarding OS besides IPSS-R.

Conclusions: The iFS separates non-clonal cytopenias and MDS with the highest accuracy, provided information in addition to standard diagnostic procedures, and refined established prognostic tools for outcome prediction.