Recovery of bowel function after transperitoneal or retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty. A multi-center study

Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Dec;37(12):1791-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04990-3. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

Abstract

Aim: To document the recovery of bowel function (BF) in children after transperitoneal (TP) or retroperitoneal (RP) laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Methods: Data were obtained retrospectively from four centers between 2008 and 2019 for TP (n = 51) and RP (n = 58). Each surgeon chose which technique to perform.

Results: Subject demographics were not significantly different. Differences in operative times were not significant (RP: 241 min versus TP: 225 min). Mean duration/requirement for postoperative epidural/intravenous analgesia were not significantly different (TP: 1.4 days versus RP: 1.3 days) and (TP: 66.7% versus RP: 67.2%), respectively. Postoperative nasogastric (NG) intubation was more common in RP (TP: 19.6% versus RP: 44.8%; p < .05). NG aspiration (TP: 0.15 mL/kg/hr versus RP: 0.16 mL/kg/hr), nausea (TP: 31.4% versus RP: 17.2%), and vomiting (TP: 19.6% versus RP: 15.5%) were not significantly different. There were no perioperative complications (including ileus). Abdominal distention was problematic in one case per group (TP: 2.0% versus RP: 1.7%). Times for oral liquid (TP: 0.69 day versus RP: 0.83 day), solid food (TP: 0.88 day versus RP 1.07 days), and the first bowel movement (TP: 2.86 days versus RP: 2.79 days), were not significantly different.

Conclusions: BF recovery would appear to be consistent, independent of technique.

Keywords: Bowel function; Children; Laparoscopy; Pyeloplasty; Retroperitoneal; Transperitoneal.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Nephrectomy
  • Retroperitoneal Space
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Ureter*