Background and objectives: Current evidence shows that tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged-release is more cost effective than other opioids. However, the introduction into the market of generic formulations of traditional comparators, leading to potential savings due to their lower price, creates space for further research. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of tapentadol versus oxycodone/naloxone and the economic impact of the two alternatives in both branded and generic formulations.
Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the third-payer perspective (TPP), with specific reference to the Italian National Health Service. A Markov model was implemented to simulate transitions between states, comparing two arms: The first arm simulated the administration of tapentadol, while the second simulated the administration of oxycodone/naloxone, both branded and generic. The results were reported in terms of net monetary benefit (NMB). The willingness to pay (WPT) was estimated at €35,000/quality-adjusted life year.
Results: Tapentadol was dominant in all scenarios, assuming a population of 1000 individuals over a 1-year time horizon. In all cases, although the prices of oxycodone/naloxone generic formulations were lower, the costs associated with treatment discontinuation were always higher than those associated with tapentadol. The comparison with the branded formulation of oxycodone/naloxone was associated with the highest savings of €431.77 per patient, and with the highest NMB of €1943.77 per patient.
Conclusion: The results of this pharmacoeconomic evaluation promote the use of tapentadol in comparison with oxycodone/naloxone, confirming the results obtained in previous studies with reference to the generic formulations.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.