Correction to: Prospective intra‑individual blinded comparison of [18F]PSMA‑1007 and [68 Ga]Ga‑PSMA‑11 PET/CT imaging in patients with confirmed prostate cancer

Correction to: Prospective intra‑individual blinded comparison of [¹⁸F]PSMA‑1007 and [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga‑PSMA‑11 PET/CT imaging in patients with confirmed prostate cancer

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Jan;49(2):789. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05548-0.

David A Pattison^{1

2}, Maciej Debowski³, Brook Gulhane³, Evyn G Arnfield⁴, Anita M Pelecanos⁵, Peter L Garcia⁴, Melissa J Latter^{4

6}, Charles Y Lin^{6

7}, Matthew J Roberts^{8

9

10}, Stuart C Ramsay^{4

11}, Paul A Thomas^{4

6}

¹ Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 2006, Australia. [email protected].
² School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. [email protected].
³ Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
⁴ Department of Nuclear Medicine & Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 2006, Australia.
⁵ Statistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
⁶ School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
⁷ Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
⁸ Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
⁹ Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Australia.
¹⁰ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
¹¹ School of Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

No abstract available