Use of scenario tree modelling to plan freedom from infection surveillance: Mycoplasma bovis in New Zealand

Since mid-2018, the New Zealand (NZ) Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) has been operating an eradication program for an incursion of Mycoplasma bovis. Although NZ is still delimiting the outbreak, consideration is being given to how freedom from M. bovis will be demonstrated. Rapid demonstration of freedom will minimise the length of the program, significantly reducing its financial burden. This collaborative research was undertaken to help inform planning of surveillance to demonstrate freedom after M. bovis is believed eradicated. Scenario tree modelling (STM) involves assimilating multiple surveillance system components to determine whether disease is absent. STM has infrequently been used to plan appropriate surveillance but this was the approach used here. A stochastic simulation model was implemented in R. The model represented the NZ commercial dairy and non-dairy cattle industries and the current surveillance components that are also planned to be used to gather evidence of absence of M. bovis once it is eradicated. Different surveillance intensities and risk based versus random surveillance were simulated and compared for probability of freedom, financial cost of sampling and testing and the time to demonstrate freedom. The results indicate that the current surveillance components will enable demonstration of freedom. Surveillance components included bulk tank milk testing, herd testing and testing at meat processing plants, predominantly using an imperfect ELISA. Several combinations of surveillance components appeared most efficient achieving >95 % confidence of freedom over 2-4 years, whilst sampling 4-7 % of the non-dairy herds and less than 25 % of dairy herds annually. The results indicate that surveillance intensity can be lower than is currently occurring to support the delimiting phase, thereby saving significant resources in the post eradication phase (proof of freedom phases). Further consideration is required to enable the assumption of 100 % herd specificity made in the model to be achieved. The ELISA used is very specific, but will yield some false positives that must be resolved to their true status. This may occur for example through modified diagnostic test interpretation (e.g. cut point optimisation at individual and herd level) or resolution of putative false positive herds with epidemiological investigation. In conclusion this research demonstrates the utility of STM for planning surveillance programs, and in this instance has highlighted efficient and effective surveillance components for demonstrating freedom from M. bovis in NZ. It also highlights the need to achieve 100 % specificity for M. bovis in herds tested during the proof of freedom phases.