Cost Comparison From a Patient Perspective for Intracranial Stereotactic Radiation Therapy

Rahul N Prasad; Vedat O Yildiz; Tejash Patel; Trevor J Royce; Joshua D Palmer

doi:10.1016/j.adro.2021.100816

Cost Comparison From a Patient Perspective for Intracranial Stereotactic Radiation Therapy

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Oct 26;7(1):100816. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100816. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.

Authors

Rahul N Prasad¹, Vedat O Yildiz², Tejash Patel³, Trevor J Royce⁴, Joshua D Palmer¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Radiation Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
² Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
³ Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine/Master of Business Administration Program, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
⁴ Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Abstract

Purpose: Historically, opaque health care pricing in the US has prevented patients from identifying opportunities to lower costs. Attempting to promote price transparency, the US government recently mandated that hospitals publish prices for all services in a document called a chargemaster. Patients often travel to tertiary centers for intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT), but cost comparison is complicated by multiple delivery systems and fractionation schemes. We hypothesized that prices published in chargemasters vary widely between SRT techniques and institutions.

Methods and materials: We obtained chargemasters published online by National Cancer Institute-designated clinical centers. Technical charges for Gamma Knife single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (GK), single-fraction linear-accelerator stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS), and 3-fraction fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) were obtained from chargemasters by billing code and keyword searches. Prices were adjusted by the Medicare geographic cost price index (GPCI). Pairwise comparisons were conducted to compare prices between modalities and geographic regions. Relationships with cost index were examined using Spearman correlations, as was the price interrelationship between modalities across institutions.

Results: Of 62 chargemasters obtained, 58 listed SRT prices. Median prices were $49,529 for GK, $31,834 for FSRT, and $22,915 for SRS. Prices varied widely, with large ranges corresponding to 2 to 9 times the magnitude of median prices (GK, $111,298; FSRT, $312,480; and SRS, $104,396). Adjusting for GPCI, GK (P = .0003) and FSRT (P = .001) were more expensive than SRS, and no difference in price was noted between regions. The FSRT price was positively correlated with GPCI (P = .033), but prices for the other techniques were not. Modality prices were all positively correlated (all P < .001), meaning that institutions with prices greater than the median price for SRS were similarly expensive for GK and FSRT.

Conclusions: Published prices for SRT vary by delivery system, fractionation, and institution without a clear explanation. Obtaining personalized price estimates may offer cost savings for patients. Policy changes encouraging reliable access to insurer-negotiated cost estimates for SRT are needed.