Early versus late intubation in COVID-19 patients failing helmet CPAP: A quantitative computed tomography study

Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2022 Jul:301:103889. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2022.103889. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the effects of timing of intubation in COVID-19 patients that fail helmet continuous positive airway pressure (h-CPAP) on progression and severity of disease.

Methods: COVID-19 patients that failed h-CPAP, required intubation, and underwent chest computed tomography (CT) at two levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP, 8 and 16 cmH2O) were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided in two groups (early versus late) based on the duration of h-CPAP before intubation. Endpoints included percentage of non-aerated lung tissue at PEEP of 8 cmH2O, respiratory system compliance and oxygenation.

Results: Fifty-two patients were included and classified in early (h-CPAP for ≤2 days, N = 26) and late groups (h-CPAP for >2 days, N = 26). Patients in the late compared to early intubation group presented: 1) lower respiratory system compliance (median difference, MD -7 mL/cmH2O, p = 0.044) and PaO2/FiO2 (MD -29 mmHg, p = 0.047), 2) higher percentage of non-aerated lung tissue (MD 7.2%, p = 0.023) and 3) similar lung recruitment increasing PEEP from 8 to 16 cmH2O (MD 0.1%, p = 0.964).

Conclusions: In COVID-19 patients receiving h-CPAP, late intubation was associated with worse clinical presentation at ICU admission and more advanced disease. The possible detrimental effects of delaying intubation should be carefully considered in these patients.

Keywords: COVID-19; CPAP; Computed tomography; Intubation; Mechanical ventilation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / therapy
  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure*
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Intratracheal
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed