Abrupt versus gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy for Chinese treatment-seeking smokers: A retrospective, observational, cohort study

Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Mar 14:20:29. doi: 10.18332/tid/145993. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of abrupt and gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy.

Methods: A total of 278 smokers who experienced moderate-to-severe nicotine dependence and visited a Chinese smoking cessation outpatient clinic from March 2017 to February 2021 were enrolled. This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Participants were divided into two groups by the cessation strategy they received: the abrupt cessation group (n=139, tobacco was not controlled during the first 3 weeks before the target cessation date and smoking was entirely discontinued on the 22nd day) and the gradual cessation group (n=139, tobacco was gradually reduced in the first 3 weeks before the target cessation date and smoking was discontinued on the 22nd day). The abstinence rates were compared between groups (7-day point prevalence abstinence rates at 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment; and 1-month and 3-month continuous abstinence rates of 6-month follow-up). Possible factors that influence efficacy, reasons for smoking cessation failure, and associated adverse events were also analyzed.

Results: No significant difference in the 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates at 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). The 1-month continuous abstinence rate of the gradual cessation group was higher than that of the abrupt cessation group (51.1% vs 31.7%; χ2=10.812, p=0.001). The 3-month continuous abstinence rate of the gradual cessation group was also higher than that of the abrupt cessation group (42.4% vs 27.3%; χ2=6.983, p=0.008). Abrupt cessation was a risk factor for successful smoking cessation than gradual cessation (AOR=2.39; 95% CI: 1.15-3.85, p=0.013),the motivation of 'prevention and treatment of own diseases' reduced the risk of incomplete abstinence (AOR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.38-0.99, p=0.049). The incidence of adverse events was higher in the abrupt cessation group than in the gradual cessation group. The incidence rates of nausea and insomnia were statistically significant differences.

Conclusions: Compared with abrupt cessation, gradual smoking cessation with pre-cessation varenicline therapy produced higher abstinence rates and relatively milder withdrawal symptoms.

Keywords: abrupt cessation; adverse events; efficacy of smoking cessation therapies; gradual cessation; varenicline.