Voluntary Assisted Dying by Practitioner Administration Is Not Suicide: A Way Past the Commonwealth Criminal Code?

J Law Med. 2022 Mar;29(1):129-141.

Abstract

Five Australian States - Victoria, Western Australia, Tasmania, South Australia and Queensland - have now legalised voluntary assisted dying (VAD). These State legislative schemes intersect with provisions in the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (Commonwealth Criminal Code) which prohibit using electronic communication to counsel, promote, or provide instruction on "suicide". These provisions may prevent some conversations and assessments relating to self-administration of VAD occurring via telehealth, thereby restricting access for prospective VAD patients in regional and remote areas. However, as practitioner administration of VAD is not "suicide", the Commonwealth Criminal Code does not apply. The Commonwealth law creates the absurd result that the same conversation conducted via telehealth is illegal when contemplating VAD by self-administration, but legal when discussing practitioner-administered VAD. To avoid this, we advocate amending the Code to remove the inconsistency with state VAD laws. We also recommend State legislatures consider permitting greater access to VAD by practitioner-administered VAD.

Keywords: Commonwealth Criminal Code; carriage service; electronic communication; practitioner administration; self-administration; suicide; telehealth; voluntary assisted dying.

MeSH terms

  • Communication
  • Criminals*
  • Humans
  • Prospective Studies
  • Suicide, Assisted*
  • Victoria