Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy versus laparoscopic transverse colectomy for mid-transverse colon cancer: a multicenter retrospective study from Kanagawa Yokohama Colorectal Cancer (KYCC) study group

Purpose: The laparoscopic surgery approach for mid-transverse colon cancer (MTC) varies depending on tumor characteristics and the guidelines implemented by each surgeon; the optimal surgical procedure for MTC has not been established. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy (Lap-ERHC) and laparoscopic transverse colectomy (Lap-TC) for MTC.

Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective study. We surveyed eight hospitals, by questionnaire, on MTC surgery policies and retrospectively compared the short- and long-term surgical outcomes for patients with MTC who underwent Lap-ERHC or Lap-TC between January 2008 and December 2019.

Results: A total of 129 patients were enrolled, of whom 35 underwent Lap-ERHC and 94 underwent Lap-TC. There were no significant differences in tumor progression between the two groups. Operation time was significantly longer (202 min vs. 185 min, p = 0.026). We observed a higher complication rate (≥ grade 3) in the Lap-ERHC group than in the Lap-TC group (11.4% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.086). Three patients (8.6%) who underwent Lap-ERHC developed anastomotic leakage; none of the patients who underwent Lap-TC had this complication (p = 0.018). The 3-year overall survival rates (stage I: 100% vs. 91.9%, p = 0.64; stage II: 100% vs. 95.5%, p = 0.46; stage III: 100% vs. 88.2%, p = 0.91, respectively) were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: Lap-ERHC for MTC has the same long-term outcomes as Lap-TC. However, Lap-ERHC for MTC has a higher complication rate. Therefore, Lap-TC may be recommended for patients with MTC.

Trial registration: UMIN000042674.