An Analytic Method for Calculating Scanner-, Kilovoltage Peak-, and Patient Size-Specific Hounsfield Unit Scale Thresholds for Agatston Score

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022 May-Jun;46(3):423-433. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001293. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to calculate scanner-, kilovoltage peak (kVp)-, and patient size-specific computed tomography (CT) number thresholds for determining Agatston score (AgSc).

Methods: The proposed method was validated using calcium measurements in an anthropomorphic phantom for 4 CT scanners made by 4 vendors. The derived mass concentration (γ) thresholds were used to calculate kVp- and patient size-specific CT number thresholds. Two models were applied to reduce intrascanner and interscanner AgSc variation, respectively.

Results: The mean error of the modeled CT numbers is 1.8% (0.1%-4.4%). Model 1 has comparable results to the published phantom calibration method for an average-size patient (error, 1.5%; 0.1%-5.1%). The size- and the kVp-dependent fitting of modeled results have R2 greater than 0.965.

Conclusions: Our results show a potential to enable accurate determination of AgSc under diverse conditions (eg, reduced tube potential) and are more easily applicable to different patient sizes than the phantom calibration method.

MeSH terms

  • Calibration
  • Humans
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed* / methods