Multiple breath washout (MBW) testing is increasingly used as a physiological measurement in the clinic, due in part to the availability of commercial equipment and reference values for MBW indices. Commercial N2 washout devices are usually based on indirect measurement of N2 concentration (CN2), by directly measuring either molar mass and O2 and CO2, or molar mass and CO2. We aim to elucidate the role of two potential pitfalls associated with N2-MBW testing that could override its physiological content: indirect N2 measurement and blood-solubility of N2. We performed MBW in 12 healthy adult subjects using a commercial device (MBWindirect) with simultaneous direct gas concentration measurements by mass spectrometry (MBWdirect) and compared CN2 between MBWdirect and MBWindirect. We also measured argon concentration during the same washouts to verify the maximal effect gas solubility can have on N2-based functional residual capacity (FRC) and lung clearance index (LCI). Continuous N2 concentration traces were very similar for MBWindirect and MBWdirect, resulting in comparable breath-by-breath washout plots of expired concentration and in no significant differences in FRCN2, LCIN2, Scond, and Sacin between the two methods. Argon washouts were slightly slower than N2 washouts, as expected for a less diffusive and more soluble gas. Finally, comparison between LCIN2 and LCIAr indicates that the maximum impact from blood-tissue represents less than half a LCI unit in normal subjects. In conclusion, we have demonstrated by direct measurement of N2 and twice as soluble argon, that indirect N2 measurement can be safely used as a meaningful physiological measurement.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The physiological content of N2 multibreath washout testing has been questioned due to N2 indirect measurement accuracy and N2 blood solubility. With direct measurement of N2 and twice as soluble argon, we show that these effects are largely outweighed by ease of use.
Keywords: lung clearance index; multiple breath washouts; nitrogen.