Emerging resistance to ceftriaxone treatment owing to different ampD mutations in Enterobacter roggenkampii

Infect Genet Evol. 2022 Aug:102:105301. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105301. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

Objectives: The Enterobacter cloacae complex is responsible for a variety of infections in hospitalized patients and is resistant to β-lactam antibiotics owing to the expression of AmpC β-lactamase. We report emerging resistance in Enterobacter roggenkampii exposed to ceftriaxone and explore the mechanism underlying mutations responsible for this resistance.

Methods: Three strains were derived from different samples from one patient (blood and liver abscess fluid). Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by standard broth microdilution, while ampC expression was determined via RT-PCR. Genetic relatedness was evaluated via pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Species identification and comparative genome analysis were performed via genome sequencing. Mutation rate testing and selection of AmpC-derepressed mutants were conducted to explore the mutation mechanism.

Results: E. roggenkampii F1247 was susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs); F95 and F1057, found in blood sample on day 11 and liver abscess drainage fluid on day 25, were resistant. ampC expression was 341- and 642-fold higher in F95 and F1057, respectively, than in F1247. Three isolates were the same PFGE and sequence types (ST1778) and were highly homologous (2 and 4 core genome single nucleotide polymorphism differences). Compared to F1247, F95 possessed a 575 bp deletion, including 537 bp of ampD, whereas F1057 harbored only one amino acid mutation (Leu140Pro in ampD). The mutation rates from F1247 exposure to cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefepime were (1.90 ± 0.21) × 10-8, (3.18 ± 0.43) × 10-8, (2.00 ± 0.20) × 10-8, (2.92 ± 0.29) × 10-9, and zero, respectively. In vitro-selected mutations responsible for resistance were identified in ampD, ampR, and dacB.

Conclusions: E. roggenkampii may develop resistance in vivo and in vitro upon exposure to 3GCs and to a lesser extent to piperacillin-tazobactam. 3GCs should not be used as a monotherapy for E. roggenkampii infections. Therapy using cefepime or carbapenems may be preferred to piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of E. roggenkampii, especially if source control is difficult.

Keywords: AmpC derepression; Ceftriaxone; Enterobacter roggenkampii; Mutation; ampD.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Bacterial Proteins / genetics
  • Bacterial Proteins / metabolism
  • Cefepime
  • Ceftriaxone* / pharmacology
  • Ceftriaxone* / therapeutic use
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
  • Enterobacter
  • Enterobacter cloacae / genetics
  • Humans
  • Liver Abscess* / drug therapy
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Mutation
  • Piperacillin
  • Tazobactam
  • beta-Lactamases / metabolism

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Bacterial Proteins
  • Ceftriaxone
  • Cefepime
  • beta-Lactamases
  • Tazobactam
  • Piperacillin

Supplementary concepts

  • Enterobacter roggenkampii