Proactive infliximab is more effective than vedolizumab in inducing fecal calprotectin remission in inflammatory bowel disease

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct;57(10):1202-1208. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2076567. Epub 2022 May 22.

Abstract

Background: Current evidence suggests vedolizumab (VDZ) may be as effective as Infliximab (IFX) in inflammatory bowel disease. It is unknown if proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (PTDM) of IFX may improve these results.

Methods: Case-control study including consecutive patients with primary response to conventional IFX (n = 70), proactive IFX (n = 148), and VDZ (n = 95). PTDM was performed at week 14 and every other infusion, aiming at a trough level between 5 and 10 µg/ml. The primary outcome was fecal calprotectin (Fc) remission (<250 µg/g) at 1 year of treatment. Secondary outcomes included Fc remission at week 14 (proactive IFX/VDZ), clinical remission, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, and surgery at 1-year of follow-up.

Results: Proactive IFX was superior to conventional IFX and VDZ in inducing Fc remission at 1-year (69.4% vs 47.1% vs 37.9%, p = .003 and p < .001). Results remained significant in biologic naïve patients (70.8% vs 44.4% vs 51.4%, p = .001 and p = .043) but comparisons between conventional IFX and VDZ were not significant (p = .265 and p = .664). In multivariate analysis correcting for prior biologic exposure, proactive IFX was more effective than conventional IFX (OR 2.480 95%CI [1.367-4.499], p = .003) and VDZ (OR 3.467 95%CI [1.578-7.617], p = .002) in inducing Fc remission. Amongst secondary outcomes, only clinical remission was significant between proactive IFX and VDZ in the overall cohort (80.4% vs 55.8%, p < .001) and in biologic naïve patients (80.2% vs 62.9%, p = .043). Fc remission at 1-year was associated with better results in most secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Proactive IFX was superior to VDZ in inducing Fc remission at 1-year, which was associated with improved clinical outcomes.SUMMARYCurrent evidence suggests that vedolizumab may be as effective as Infliximab in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.There have been no studies comparing vedolizumab with proactively optimized Infliximab based on trough levels.We confirm that conventional IFX is as effective as vedolizumab but proactive IFX appears superior to vedolizumab in inducing fecal calprotectin remission.Fecal calprotectin remission associates with better clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Inflammatory bowel disease; fecal calprotectin; infliximab; proactive therapeutic drug monitoring; vedolizumab.

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Biological Products* / therapeutic use
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Chronic Disease
  • Colitis, Ulcerative* / drug therapy
  • Gastrointestinal Agents / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases* / chemically induced
  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases* / drug therapy
  • Infliximab / therapeutic use
  • Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Biological Products
  • Gastrointestinal Agents
  • Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex
  • vedolizumab
  • Infliximab