Neuropsychological Assessment of Cognitive Impairment in Kidney Transplantation (NAsKiT) and its related risk factors: a study protocol

Background: Association of cognitive impairment with chronic kidney disease has been reported over the last decade. Individuals show better cognitive performance after kidney transplantation than individuals on dialysis but are more likely to be affected by cognitive impairment than age-matched comparison groups. Better knowledge of the prevalence as well as course and profile of cognitive impairment is important for the design of future studies assessing the clinical impact of cognitive impairment and developing management strategies. The goal of our study is to examine the extent of cognitive impairment before and after transplantation and to derive a distinct profile of cognitive function using standard neurocognitive tests. Furthermore, we aim to assess whether transplantation per se leads to an improvement in cognitive performance.

Methods: We are conducting a prospective single-center cohort study involving 100 kidney transplant individuals. Individuals who are wait-listed to receive a kidney transplantation or have already received one will be included in this study. Individuals will undergo a battery of detailed neurocognitive tests at baseline (in part before surgery), and then 3 and 12 months afterwards. Furthermore, the enrolled patients will complete a validated German version of the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire for self-assessment (s-CFQ) as well as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale -Deutsche (HADS-D), a self-report screening instrument with two scales that capture anxiety and depression. In addition, a hair sample will be taken at each measurement time point for the determination of hair cortisol levels as a parameter for the cumulative hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis activity over the previous three months. The primary outcome measure will be (a) the effect of kidney transplantation on the cognitive performance up to 12 months after transplantation and (b) the course of cognitive performance following kidney transplantation over time.

Discussion: The results of our study have potentially important implications for the prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment in kidney transplant individuals. By increasing our knowledge of the neurocognitive profile and assigning the corresponding deficits, it might be possible to create an individualized training program to positively impact cognitive deficits in kidney transplant patients.