Characterization of Contemporary Conventional, Bulk-fill, and Self-adhesive Resin Composite Materials

Oper Dent. 2022 Jul 1;47(4):392-402. doi: 10.2341/21-063-L.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the physical and biological properties of different types of flowable resin composites and their bonding ability to dentin, comparing the performance of self-adhesive and bulk-fill materials with a conventional control.

Methods and materials: Four flowable resin composites were tested: two self-adhesive (Y-flow [SA_YF]; and Dyad Flow [SA_DF]); one bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow [BF]); and one conventional composite (Opallis Flow [OF]). The microshear bond strength (μSBS) to dentin (bovine samples) was investigated at 24 hours and 6 months of storage. The materials were also characterized by degree of conversion, cross-link density, water contact angle, color stability, and cell viability (ISO 10993-5/2009) analyses. Data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance and Tukey tests (α=0.05).

Results: The μSBS values were higher for control specimens at 24 hours, whereas the resin-dentin bonds were similarly distributed among the groups after aging. Adhesive failure was the most frequent pattern observed at both time intervals. SA_YF was the only material that increased the bond strength over time. Degree of conversion increased in the following order: SA_YF (28.6±1.4%) < BF (49.7±0.8%) < OF (60.0±2.0%) = SA_DF (63.6±2.3%). Cross-link density was similar among all materials. The self-adhesive composites were more hydrophilic than the other types, with BF showing the lowest water contact angle and the greatest color alteration. All resin composites had a biocompatible behavior.

Conclusion: Chemical composition appeared to be an influential factor affecting the physico-mechanical and biological behavior of the materials tested.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cattle
  • Composite Resins* / chemistry
  • Materials Testing
  • Resin Cements* / chemistry
  • Water

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Resin Cements
  • Water