Introduction: Optimal glycaemic control is essential for the prevention of future micro- and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D). The type of insulin, the type of insulin delivery device, the caregiver's knowledge, the patient's age, duration of diabetes, and self-monitoring of blood glucose affect glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes. In the present study, we analysed glycaemic control and factors affecting it at a tertiary care centre in northern India.
Material and methods: A retrospective review of records of patients registered between 2015 and 2018 was done. The data on demographic and disease-related factors were collected from the records. The different groups were compared with the t-test, one-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results: The mean age at the time of evaluation was 10.43 ±4.04 years (2-21 years), and the mean disease duration was 46.61 ±28.49 months (16-141 months). Most of the patients were prepubertal and using a basal-bolus regimen. The mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ) was 7.96 ±1.46%, but only 24% had HbA1c below the International Society of Paediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) recommended desirable level of below 7%. Forty-six patients suffered one or more micro-macrovascular complications, and dyslipidaemia was the most common complication. Children with a longer duration of disease (8.39 ±1.42% vs. 7.59 ±1.65%), an episode of DKA (diabetes ketoacidosis) within a year of evaluation (9.19 ±2.54% vs. 7.93 ±1.39%), lower maternal (8.22 ±1.37% vs. 7.56 ±1.45%) and paternal education (8.26 ±1.67% vs. 7.78 ±1.30%), and hyperthyroid state (9.43 ±2.28% vs. 7.91 ±1.45%) had higher HbA1c.
Conclusions: Better diabetes education focusing on parents with lower education strata and children with longer disease duration and poor compliance can help improve glycaemic control in developing countries like India.
Keywords: education.; glycaemic control; glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); type 1 diabetes.